Five templates for the analysis requests reviewers actually make, with the analysis each one requires and the wording that settles it. Free, no email required, modify as you like.
↓ Download the kit (Markdown, 6 KB)
Answered with a sensitivity table, not an argument. Half a day of work. The method →
Answered with a blind automated annotation compared cluster by cluster. What that looks like →
Integrate, then prove you did not dissolve the biology. The checks →
The one that is usually right. Pseudobulk per subject, then a bulk method. On real data →
Additive modules, framed as hypotheses rather than findings. A worked trajectory →
Seven things reviewers check that authors forget — per-sample QC table, doublet rate, stated statistical unit, tool versions, deposited code.
Most of these you can do yourself in a few days, and you should — it is your paper. We would rather be the people whose templates you used than the people who charged you to find out that pseudobulk exists. When a request genuinely needs work you do not have time for, we are here, with a fixed price and revisions included.